Thursday, December 15, 2011

FORUM: Special Conference (2) Tackling corruption and miscommunication among large corporations

QUESTION OF: Tackling corruption and miscommunication among large corporations

SUBMITTED BY: JAPAN

CO-SUBMITTED BY:
Brazil, Angola, Vietnam, Libya, Cote d'lvoire, Thailand, China, Congo, Spain, Hungry, Austria, Norway, Lebanon, USA, Ghana

THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY,

Recalling How many resolutions have tried to remove corruption such as: 55/61 (making a effective tool against corruption), 56/186 (preventing corrupt individuals to transfer money), 2001/13 (a Convention against corruption), and 57/169 (entitled “Strengthening international cooperation in preventing and combating the transfer of funds of illicit origin, derived from acts of corruption, including the laundering of funds, and in returning such funds,”

Recognizing that according to TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL Brazil is rated badly between: 3 – 3.9 from the 10,

Alarmed that many other countries are also rated between 3.9 – and 1,

Noting with concern that in many countries, including Brazil, corruption is treated very lightly,

Fully alarmed that competing with a corrupt individual is very difficult as one has the ability to take and receive bribes,

Emphasizing that corruption is an indirect way of stealing from another, usually when the other doesn’t realize such bribing as competition looses out,

Regarding the seriousness of problems and threats by corruption that are posed on individuals, societies, and the world:

1. Asks that a law is made that makes every organization and company need to pay 1% of revenue per annum to a new fund; elaborate:
a. Each company must have a special fund that can only be accessed with the permission of the UN Corruption Division,
2. Calls for the UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice division to:
a. Let employees of companies and citizens who know and have proof of corruption send it via Internet and /or mail anonymously,



b. Request the Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention to give:
b.i. Technical assistance,
b.ii. Help on prioritizing the best pieces of proof and
research,
b.iii. Help on Identifying large transactions done by company
members,
b.iv. Assistance on companies that have been corrupt by:
b.iv.1. Fining them with a fine dependent on what the
UN thinks,
b.iv.2. Exposing them to the world,
c. Give the amount of money collected in 3 years from the special company fund to the whistleblower (employee or citizen),
3. Encourages the UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice division to check annual income and expenditure of nations which have been suffering from corruption in order to;
a. Help nations to detect corrupt activities easily,
b. Increase speed of detecting process of corruption,
c. Deter people who are willing to be a part of corrupt activities,

4. Further Encourages for that the UNCAC to ask for the increase of the amount meeting held annually by the UNODC,

5. Advises the UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice to set up a program that will educate people of the implications, concept, and consequences of corruption throughout the world,

6. Designates the UN crime prevention and criminal justice division to ask for universal laws that will treat corruption as stealing or murder,

7. Further asks that a law will be made to remove all individuals who have been corrupt in the past 15 years,
8. Requests that a universal law is made that commands every country to make public what investigation they have been doing on corruption with the time they spent,
9. Further requests for the countries which agree with the four laws states above to Boycott the countries that don’t agree with the four laws stated above by preventing oil, gas, money, companies, transactions, food, and water to come there,
10. Recommends that the UN crime prevention and criminal justice division to make a press conference stating the important of ending corruption and why the UN has taken such a hard stance so swiftly.

Hakan TUNÇ 11B
MUNISH / The Hague / Holland

No comments:

Post a Comment